首页> 外文OA文献 >Problems with the application of hydrogeological science to regulation of Australian mining projects: Carmichael Mine and Doongmabulla Springs
【2h】

Problems with the application of hydrogeological science to regulation of Australian mining projects: Carmichael Mine and Doongmabulla Springs

机译:水文地质科学在澳大利亚采矿项目监管中的应用问题:Carmichael Mine和Doongmabulla Springs

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Understanding and managing impacts from mining on groundwater-dependent ecosystems (GDEs) and other groundwater users requires development of defensible science supported by adequate field data. This usually leads to the creation of predictive models and analysis of the likely impacts of mining and their accompanying uncertainties. The identification, monitoring and management of impacts on GDEs are often a key component of mine approvals, which need to consider and attempt to minimise the risks that negative impacts may arise. Here we examine a case study where approval for a large mining project in Australia (Carmichael Coal Mine) was challenged in court on the basis that it may result in more extensive impacts on a GDE (Doongmabulla Springs) of high ecological and cultural significance than predicted by the proponent. We show that throughout the environmental assessment and approval process, significant data gaps and scientific uncertainties remained unresolved. Evidence shows that the assumed conceptual hydrogeological model for the springs could be incorrect, and that at least one alternative conceptualisation (that the springs are dependent on a deep fault) is consistent with the available field data. Assumptions made about changes to spring flow as a consequence of mine-induced drawdown also appear problematic, with significant implications for the spring-fed wetlands. Despite the large scale of the project, it appears that critical scientific data required to resolve uncertainties and construct robust models of the springs’ relationship to the groundwater system were lacking at the time of approval, contributing to uncertainty and conflict. For this reason, we recommend changes to the approval process that would require a higher standard of scientific information to be collected and reviewed, particularly in relation to key environmental assets during the environmental impact assessment process in future projects.
机译:要了解和管理采矿活动对依赖地下水的生态系统(GDE)和其他地下水使用者的影响,就需要发展有充分依据的现场数据支持的可辩护的科学。这通常会导致创建预测模型并分析采矿的可能影响及其伴随的不确定性。对GDE的影响的识别,监视和管理通常是矿山许可的关键组成部分,需要考虑并试图将可能产生负面影响的风险降至最低。在这里,我们研究了一个案例研究,其中对澳大利亚的一个大型采矿项目(Carmichael Coal Mine)的批准在法庭上受到质疑,其依据是,这可能会对具有较高生态和文化意义的GDE(Doongmabulla Springs)产生更大的影响由支持者。我们表明,在整个环境评估和审批过程中,仍未解决重大的数据空白和科学不确定性。证据表明,假设的弹簧概念水文地质模型可能是错误的,并且至少有一种替代性的概念化(弹簧取决于深层断层)与可用的现场数据一致。由于地雷引起的水位下降而引起的春季水流变化的假设也似乎存在问题,这对春季喂养的湿地具有重大意义。尽管该项目规模很大,但在批准时似乎仍缺乏解决不确定性和构建泉水与地下水系统关系的稳健模型所需的关键科学数据,从而加剧了不确定性和冲突。因此,我们建议对批准程序进行更改,这将需要收集和审查更高标准的科学信息,尤其是在未来项目的环境影响评估过程中与关键环境资产相关的信息。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号